Automatic Identification System (AIS) telemetry from hundreds of thousands of vessels defeats hand-crafted alert thresholds. We study two-stage screening on a 90-day per-vessel AIS history (December 2025–March 2026) from a commercial aggregator. The first stage, TSMixer v2, a 36 K-parameter all-multilayer-perceptron (MLP) classifier trained to reproduce weather-aware rule labels, reaches over three seeds a precision–recall area under the curve of 0.995 and an F1 of 0.967 on a vessel-grouped split. In an external, recall-type check with kinematic-only (no-weather) labels, vessels on UK or US sanctions lists were 1.53 times as likely as matched controls to exceed the controls’ 90th-percentile flag share (95% CI 1.31–1.76), although mean shares did not differ. The second stage forecasts 24 position reports from 48: DefenseTSMixer, regressing absolute coordinates, errs by 229 km out of sample against 20 km for persistence; a motion-gated hybrid of persistence and a displacement-target Transformer reaches 17.1 km on a larger test set. A per-class Robust-Z scorer with a temporally disjoint reference flags fewer rows than a global one (17.7 versus 26.4%), but not with a motion-matched reference (11.6 versus 12.0%); its flags agree weakly with the rule labels and are screening signals, not validated anomaly evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albaqami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: