Addressing weak spatial support for heritage interpretation in historic districts, this study develops a spatial narrative planning framework using Zhengding Ancient City as a case. Its case-based contribution is to connect visitor-rated tourism experience and expert-rated historical–cultural value with node grading, overlapping thematic planning extents and differentiated route proposals. Functional classification and semantic differential evaluation inform node grading; topological steps and metric distances define thematic extents; and local Integration (R = 500 m) identifies internal core areas, while local Choice supports visitor-route planning. The inventory contains 25 unique narrative nodes. The proposed Religious Affairs route forms a linear backbone approximately 3253 m long. The Religious Affairs cluster has the highest historical–cultural score, whereas Public Affairs has the highest tourism-experience score; Residential Life is spatially fragmented, and Urban Defense shows a south–north contrast. These findings support different planning priorities across themes and connect site evaluation with area and route organization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: