Key result
Transjugular leadless pacemaker implantation proves safe and feasible in severe kyphosis with tortuous femoral anatomy.
Why the study?
Anatomical challenges such as severe spinal deformities and venous tortuosity complicate conventional leadless pacemaker implantation approaches in frail older adults.
Is transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker feasible and safe in an older adult with severe kyphosis precluding supine positioning and tortuous femoral veins?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Is transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker feasible and safe in an older adult with severe kyphosis precluding supine positioning and tortuous femoral veins?
Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker in the lateral decubitus position is a safe and feasible alternative for frail patients whose severe spinal deformities and vascular tortuosity contraindicate conventional access routes.
May offer alternative access for leadless pacing in complex anatomy; leaves open need for prospective validation before wider adoption.
Background Leadless pacemaker systems offer significant benefits for frail older adults by avoiding pocket- and lead-related complications. However, anatomical challenges including severe spinal deformities and significant venous tortuosity can complicate conventional transfemoral or trans-subclavian implantation. Case report A 97-year-old man with severe kyphosis, tortuous femoral veins, and high-grade atrioventricular block was referred for permanent pacing. Supine positioning for subclavian access was not feasible, and the femoral anatomy posed an unacceptably high procedural risk. Following a multidisciplinary assessment and procedural planning, a transjugular approach was selected. Implantation was performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, using adapted fluoroscopic projections and temporary femoral pacing as backup. An Aveir ventricular response leadless pacemaker was successfully delivered via the right internal jugular vein. Final device parameters were satisfactory, with a sensing amplitude of 8.5 mV, a pacing threshold of 0.5 V at 0.4 ms, and an impedance of 510 Ω. No perioperative complications occurred. At follow-up, exertional dyspnea had resolved, and device performance remained stable. Conclusion This case demonstrates that transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker can be a safe and feasible alternative for older adults with complex anatomical limitations that contraindicate standard pacing approaches. Careful preprocedural assessment and adaptation of intraoperative techniques are essential for procedural success in high-risk settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) conducted a case report in High-degree atrioventricular block (n=1). Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker was evaluated on Procedural success and device performance. Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker was safe and feasible in a 97-year-old man with severe kyphosis and tortuous femoral veins, resolving exertional dyspnea with stable device parameters at 4 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: