Key result
Deep neural network estimates intramural slow-conduction layer depth from epicardial optical signals within ~0.3 mm.
Why the study?
Epicardial optical mapping integrates fluorescence over depth, making intramural slow conduction difficult to localize from surface signals alone.
Does a one-dimensional residual neural network accurately predict intramural slow-conduction depth from simulated epicardial optical mapping?
Does a one-dimensional residual neural network accurately predict intramural slow-conduction depth from simulated epicardial optical mapping?
A physics-guided deep learning model can successfully recover intramural slow-conduction layer depth from a single simulated epicardial optical action potential trace.
Supports deep learning inference of intramural depth from simulated epicardial signals; leaves open experimental validation and clinical translation.
Epicardial optical mapping integrates fluorescence over depth, making intramural slow conduction difficult to localize from surface signals alone. We present a simulation-based proof-of-concept study coupling monodomain electrophysiology and Monte Carlo photon transport to generate epicardial optical action potentials (OAPs) from slow-conduction layers in a 5 mm ventricular wall. In an initial 71-case depth sweep with fixed layer properties, 5-fold cross-validation of a one-dimensional residual network gave $$r=0.963$$ , R²=0.916 , and RMSE $$=0.298$$ mm, with reduced performance beyond approximately 3 mm. We then varied start depth (0.5–3.5 mm), thickness (0.15–0.50 mm), and conductivity multiplier (0.15–0.4) in a 279-case factorial study. Training the same architecture on this expanded dataset and using grouped-depth cross-validation, in which every substrate variant at each test depth was withheld, retained predictive depth information across all tested combinations ( $$r=0.852$$ , R²=0.717 , RMSE $$=0.476$$ mm), although accuracy varied with layer thickness and conductivity. Previously acquired rabbit optical and depth-stepped microelectrode recordings showed behaviour consistent with the simulated signals but were not used to train or quantitatively validate the estimator. These results demonstrate that simulated OAP morphology contains recoverable information about slow-layer depth across the tested variations in layer thickness and conductivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maciūnas et al. (2026) studied Simulated intramural ventricular slow-conduction (n=350). One-dimensional residual convolutional neural network (ResNet) vs. Feature-ridge baseline was evaluated on Predicted vs ground-truth slow-conduction layer depth (RMSE) (RMSE 0.298 mm). A one-dimensional residual neural network estimated the depth of a simulated intramural slow-conduction layer directly from a single epicardial optical action potential with a root-mean-square error of 0.298 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: