Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Water-displacement and WinRHIZO root-scanning methods were compared for efficacy of root damage assessment. Results from both methods were similar and a highly significant relationship was found between the two methods in trial one (r 2 = 0.9968, P < 0.0001) and trial two (r 2 = 0.9988, P < 0.0001). Both protocols provide consistent root volume measurements; however, water displacement is preferred as an economical method if a quick evaluation of a large amount of roots is essential. For a more detailed root morphological and architectural analysis, WinRHIZO root scanning provides additional information about several root parameters that cannot be measured by simple water displacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: