Key result
Prior PCI links to ~4.5-fold higher odds of epicardial spasm in ANOCA patients.
Why the study?
Among ANOCA patients, the associations between prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI and coronary microvascular and vasomotor dysfunction endotypes were unclear.
Does a history of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI increase the odds of epicardial spasm in ANOCA patients?
Cohort (n=624)
Does a history of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI increase the odds of epicardial spasm in ANOCA patients?
Odds Ratio: 4.55 (95% CI 2.65–8.07)
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 34%
p-value: p=<0.001
Among ANOCA patients, a history of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI is strongly associated with epicardial spasm and worse angina-related health status, highlighting the importance of invasive functional testing in this group.
Suggests spasm testing in ANOCA with prior PCI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients undergoing coronary angiography have angina with no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). Among ANOCA patients, 2 distinct groups exist: patients with and without a history of prior obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate associations between history of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI and coronary microvascular and vasomotor dysfunction endotypes in ANOCA patients. METHODS: A prospective Coronary Microvascular and Vasomotor Dysfunction Registry of consecutive ANOCA patients undergoing invasive coronary functional testing (ICFT). RESULTS: Among 624 ANOCA patients undergoing ICFT, 11% had prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI. ANOCA patients with prior obstructive CAD had a higher prevalence of males, were older, and had higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors. Prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI was associated with an 11-point lower Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 summary score in unadjusted (β -11.0; 95% CI: -17.0 to -4.4; P = 0.001) and adjusted models. Patients with prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI had a higher prevalence of epicardial spasm by angiographic criteria (70% vs 34%; P < 0.001) and 4.55-fold higher odds of epicardial spasm in unadjusted (OR: 4.55; 95% CI: 2.65-8.07; P < 0.001) and adjusted models, with similar odds of coronary microvascular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Among ANOCA patients, those with prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI had over a 4-fold higher odds of epicardial spasm. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive ICFT in ANOCA patients with prior PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzoumas et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Angina with no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) (n=624). History of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI vs. No history of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI was evaluated on Epicardial spasm by angiographic criteria (OR 4.55, 95% CI 2.65-8.07, p=<0.001). Among ANOCA patients, a history of prior obstructive CAD treated with PCI was associated with 4.55-fold higher odds of epicardial spasm (70% vs 34%; OR 4.55; 95% CI 2.65-8.07; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: