Key result
Pneumococcal sepsis after burn injury is linked to more severe cardiac contractile dysfunction than either alone.
Why the study?
The combined effects of burn injury and pneumonia sepsis on myocardial contractile dysfunction in vivo were not well characterized.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Burn-sepsis synergy may worsen contractile dysfunction; leaves open applicability beyond this murine model.
We evaluated hemodynamic and cardiac contractile dysfunction in a murine model of 40% contact burn complicated by Streptococcus pneumoniae (1 x 10(5) CFU) sepsis. Male, 9- to 10-week-old C57/BL6 mice were divided into the following groups: sham burn, sham sepsis; 24 h after burn alone; 24 h after sepsis alone; 7 days after burn alone; and 7 days after burn followed by pneumonia sepsis. Hemodynamic and cardiac contractile function was assessed with carotid artery cannulation and left ventricular pressure-volume analysis. At 24 h after burn, there were significant decreases in all load-insensitive contractility variables including the end-systolic pressure volume relationship, preload-recruitable stroke work, and maximum elastance, but there were no changes in global hemodynamics. Twenty-four hours after sepsis, there was similar cardiac contractile dysfunction, along with a decrease in cardiac output, but mean arterial pressure was maintained with an increase in systemic vascular resistance. Late burn (7 days) was associated with a recovery of all contractility variables except the end-systolic pressure volume relationship. However, sepsis induced during the late burn period was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate and cardiac output, but mean arterial pressure was still maintained with increased systemic vascular resistance. With burn complicated by sepsis, all cardiac contractility variables showed profound contractile dysfunction. Our data indicate that burn complicated by sepsis is associated with more pronounced cardiac contractile dysfunction than burn alone or sepsis alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2005) studied Burn injury complicated by pneumonia sepsis. Burn injury complicated by Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis vs. Sham burn/sepsis, burn alone, and sepsis alone was evaluated on Hemodynamic and cardiac contractile dysfunction (assessed via left ventricular pressure-volume analysis). Burn complicated by Streptococcus pneumoniae sepsis was associated with more pronounced cardiac contractile dysfunction than burn alone or sepsis alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: