Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
By using simulation methods, we studied the adsorption of binary CO 2 –CH 4 mixtures on various CH 4 preadsorbed carbonaceous materials (e.g., triply periodic carbon minimal surfaces, slit-shaped carbon micropores, and Harris’s virtual porous carbons) at 293 K. Regardless of the different micropore geometry, two-stage mechanism of CH 4 displacement from carbon nanospaces by coadsorbed CO 2 has been proposed. In the first stage, the coadsorbed CO 2 molecules induced the enhancement of CH 4 adsorbed amount. In the second stage, the stronger affinity of CO 2 to flat/curved graphitic surfaces as well as CO 2 –CO 2 interactions cause the displacement of CH 4 molecules from carbonaceous materials. The operating conditions of CO 2 -induced cleaning of the adsorbed phase from CH 4 mixture component strongly depend on the size of the carbon micropores, but, in general, the enhanced adsorption field in narrow carbon ultramicropores facilitates the nonreactive displacement of CH 4 by coadsorbed CO 2 . This is because in narrow carbon ultramicropores the equilibrium CO 2 /CH 4 selectivity (i.e., preferential adsorption toward CO 2 ) increased significantly. The adsorption field in wider micropores (i.e., the overall surface energy) for both CO 2 and CH 4 is very similar, which decreases the preferential CO 2 adsorption. This suppresses the displacement of CH 4 by coadsorbed CO 2 and assists further adsorption of CH 4 from the bulk mixture (i.e., CO 2 /CH 4 mixing in adsorbed phase).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kowalczyk et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: