The large-scale stockpiling and low reactivity of red mud (RM) constrain its resource utilization. Alkali, thermal, and sulfate activation were investigated by combining uniaxial compression, energy analysis, pore-structure fractal characterization, and microstructural analysis to compare the variations and interrelationships among pore-structure fractality, compressive strength, and dissipated energy of red mud-based cementitious materials under different activation pathways. Compared with the 28-day compressive strength of the control (3.60 MPa), the mixtures activated with 4% sodium silicate, heat-treated RM at 800 °C, and 4% flue gas desulfurization gypsum reached 5.56, 6.08, and 7.33 MPa, respectively. The corresponding pore-structure fractal dimensions increased from 2.4287 for the control to 2.4379, 2.4429, and 2.4757, following the same order as compressive strength and indicating a positive correlation between fractal dimension and compressive strength. In contrast, the final dissipated energy densities of the three activated systems were 0.058, 0.044, and 0.052 MJ/m³, respectively, all higher than the control value of 0.038 MJ/m³, but with a different ranking from fractal dimension and compressive strength. The 4% sodium silicate-activated system exhibited the highest final dissipated energy density and more gradual post-peak softening, whereas the 4% flue gas desulfurization gypsum-activated system showed the highest compressive strength but a steeper post-peak stress drop. These results show that pore-structure fractal dimension increases with compressive strength, whereas dissipated energy varies non-monotonically with fractal dimension and is also influenced by crack propagation and damage evolution during loading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: