The flexural strength of basalt fiber-reinforced concrete (BFRC) is governed by nonlinear interactions among mixture proportions and fiber-related variables. To address the limited availability of BFRC data and the risk of overfitting, this study developed a workflow combining physically constrained generation–screening data augmentation, comparative machine learning, model interpretation, and graphical user interface (GUI) implementation. A literature-derived database of 245 real samples was divided into 172 training samples and a fixed real test set of 73 samples. Candidate generation and screening were confined to the training data, whereas the real test set was excluded from augmentation, synthetic-sample screening, hyperparameter configuration, and cross-validation. On the fixed real test split, Histogram-based gradient boosting (HGB) achieved the best numerical performance among the nine evaluated configurations, with a weighted training R² of 0.996 and an unweighted test R² of 0.931, together with test MAE and RMSE values of 0.261 and 0.423 MPa, respectively. SHAP identified silica fume, cement, and water as the leading predictive variables. One- and two-dimensional ALE analyses further showed that binder composition, water content, aggregate proportions, and fiber content jointly shaped the model response. The HGB-based GUI therefore provides preliminary BFRC mixture screening within the sampled data domain, while extrapolated or critical mixtures require experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: