Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Multi-view electroencephalography (EEG) emotion recognition must decide how the spectral graph sets of different connectivity views correspond and how their graph propagation operators interact. We present CSTO-Net, a cross-view spectral-transport and topology-operator network for EEG-based emotion recognition. Approach: CSTO-Net integrates three window-wise views: dynamic differential entropy (DDE) as node attributes, amplitude-envelope Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) graphs, and phase-locking value (PLV) graphs. Cross-View Spectral Transport Routing (CSTR) formulates PCC-PLV spectral correspondence as an entropy-regularized optimal-transport problem with explicit marginal constraints, deliberately separating correspondence estimation from band-importance estimation. Directional Cross-Topology Modulation (DCTM) performs ordered composition of the two routed propagation operators on shared node features and encodes order-dependent propagation discrepancy via a provably skew-symmetric graph-operator commutator with signed decomposition. Main results: On the Database for Emotion Analysis using Physiological Signals (DEAP) dataset, CSTO-Net achieves 93.95 ± 2.50% valence and 94.97 ± 2.72% arousal accuracy under the subject-dependent setting, and 93.73% and 94.54% under participant-wise five-fold subject-independent cross-validation across 32 participants. On the SJTU Emotion EEG Dataset (SEED), it achieves 93.12% under the standard subject-dependent split, 91.36% under 15-fold leave-one-subject-out evaluation across 15 participants, and 98.05 ± 2.32% under subject-dependent five-fold cross-validation. Ablation studies confirm that both CSTR and DCTM contribute substantially to recognition accuracy. Significance: These results demonstrate that explicit cross-view spectral correspondence and topology-operator-level interaction provide complementary benefits for EEG emotion recognition, offering an interpretable route for modeling order-sensitive interactions between functional connectivity views.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: