Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Superficial feedback by peers diminishes the efficacy of peer assessment. AI-assisted peer assessment might address this challenge, but its effect on vocabulary acquisition and academic resilience remains underexplored. Therefore, we examined how AI-assisted peer assessment contributes to EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and academic resilience. Applying a mixed-methods design, three intact classes were randomly divided into three conditions: an AI-assisted peer assessment condition, a conventional peer assessment group, and a control group. A researcher-made test measured learners’ baseline and post-intervention vocabulary knowledge. Secondly, narrative frames and semi-structured interviews explored learners’ perceptions and experiences of academic resilience. The results demonstrated that the AI-assisted peer assessment condition achieved the highest posttest vocabulary scores, followed by the conventional peer assessment group and the control group. Thematic analyses of qualitative data revealed that AI-assisted peer assessment contributed to academic resilience by promoting self-regulated persistence, assisting learners in managing uncertainty through conditional trust in AI mediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Behbahani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: