Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This unrefereed research preprint establishes a computer-assisted, quantitatively certified non-identifiability result for fragment-size-averaged Holevo information in an N=4 environment with two equiprobable pure pointer-conditioned branches. For every point in an explicitly specified closed rational rectangle of coordinate area 4 × 10^-14, two realizations of the complete averaged Holevo information curve exist: one with minimum pure-common-rest carrier size two and another with carrier size four. The proof combines a uniform parameterized contraction mapping, directed interval arithmetic with a second interval implementation, and an intermediate-value construction. Reproducibility materials include the certification programs, frozen numerical certificates, SHA-256 checksums, and a standalone 200-state numerical comparison against direct 16-dimensional partial traces. Both interval implementations share the underlying analytic Holevo reduction and do not constitute independent symbolic proofs. The conclusions are restricted to N=4, equiprobable pure branches, fragment-size-averaged Holevo information, and the specified carrier definition. They do not establish non-identifiability for arbitrary N, mixed states, unequal priors, or individual labeled-fragment information. This is an unrefereed preprint, not a formally verified or peer-reviewed mathematical theorem. Comprehensive novelty priority is not claimed. Licensing: The manuscript and original documentation/data are provided under CC BY 4.0 where applicable. Original Python research code is provided under the MIT License. The accompanying reproducibility archive specifies licenses on a per-file basis. AI assistance disclosure: OpenAI ChatGPT assisted with mathematical analysis, Python implementation, numerical and interval verification, manuscript preparation, and quality assurance. Claude contributed critical assessment and adversarial review assistance. Neither AI system is a coauthor or an external scientific referee. The human author, Yoichi Tsujisawa, assumes responsibility for the research and its publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoichi Tsujisawa (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: