A symmetric Gaussian cubic form on the Pythagorean Angle Lattice admits a complete composition law in ℤ[√3], classifies all unit triples via Pell shells, and yields Pell symmetries with explicit spectral and arithmetic dynamics. The Pythagorean angle lattice is PAL = {cot(α/D) : α ∈ 𝒜, D ≥ 1}, where the set 𝒜 of Pythagorean angles consists of the arguments of the non-torsion elements of the group 𝒰 of rational points of the unit circle. Every point eiα ∈ 𝒰 is z/¯z for a primitive Gaussian integer z = x + iy with x/y = cot(α/2), the depth-2 value of α in PAL. We prove that three points of 𝒰 of heights H₀, H₁, H₂ always satisfy |w₀ + w₁ + w₂| ≥ (H₀ H₁ H₂)-1/2, and that this bound is governed by the symmetric Gaussian cubic form 𝒲(u, v, w) = ¯u v w + u ¯v w + u v ¯w. Its extremal solutions, the unit triples with 𝒲(u, v, w) a Gaussian unit, are the subject of the paper. We show that unit triples are exactly the solutions of a composition law in ℤ[√3]: with φ(x + iy) = x + y √3, one has 𝒲(u, v, w) = 1 if and only if d(u, v) φ(w) = φ(u) φ(v), where d(u, v) = 3 Re(¯u v)² − Im(¯u v)². Consequently φ(u) φ(v) φ(w) = d(u, v) d(v, w) d(w, u), the pairwise determinants multiply to values of x² − 3 y², and their prime factors ℓ > 3 split in ℚ(√3), while the ramified prime 3 divides at most one of them, and only to the first power. We classify the unit triples with a pairwise determinant 3 by the factorisations of the Pell shells m_k + 3 n_k i, prove that every pair with determinant 3 extends, classify the triples containing a unit, show that no nonconstant polynomial family exists and no one-variable rational family in which all three coordinates are unbounded, and prove that for each determinant there are effectively finitely many balanced triples. Finally we construct Pell symmetries of 𝒲 and determine their spectral geometry, determinant dynamics, trace algebra, ranks of apparition and escape behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chetansing K. Rajput (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: