Background Ethambutol is a key component of treatment for Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), primarily through suppression of macrolide resistance. However, adverse drug reactions frequently lead to treatment interruption, and evidence-based alternatives remain limited. We evaluated the feasibility and outcomes of a structured outpatient ethambutol desensitisation protocol in patients with MAC-PD who developed ethambutol intolerance or hypersensitivity. Methods We conducted a multicentre observational study across four specialist NTM centres. Patients undergoing treatment for MAC-PD who experienced an ethambutol-related adverse reaction leading to drug cessation were eligible. A patient-led outpatient desensitisation protocol commenced at 25 mg daily with gradual dose escalation to a weight-based target dose. The protocol allowed temporary dose reduction to previously tolerated levels if symptoms recurred. Success was defined as achievement of the target dose or maintenance of a tolerated dose associated with sustained culture conversion. Results Twenty desensitisation episodes were performed in 17 patients (65% female; mean age 72 years). The most common indication was rash (70%), followed by headache (15%). Overall, 17/20 (85%) desensitisations were successful, including 13/14 (93%) among patients with delayed cutaneous reactions. Mean time to target dose was 9 weeks (median 4 weeks). No severe immediate hypersensitivity reactions occurred during desensitisation. Sixteen episodes (80%) were associated with culture conversion, and 11 (55%) patients completed therapy with ethambutol-containing regimens. Conclusions Outpatient ethambutol desensitisation appears feasible, safe and effective in selected patients with MAC-PD and non-severe ethambutol intolerance. This approach may help preserve an essential component of MAC therapy when treatment options are otherwise limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denby et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: