Preclinical laboratory study reveals poor bacterial kill and rapid resistance to ethambutol in Mycobacterium kansasii, suggesting the need for alternative therapies.
Rifampin, isoniazid, and ethambutol are the backbone of the regimen used to treat Mycobacterium kansasii- complex (MKC) lung disease. However, ethambutol pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) studies to inform on optimal exposure target and clinical dose for MKC are lacking. We performed studies to determine ethambutol minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), mutation frequency (3× MIC), a PK/PD study using the hollow fiber system model of MKC (HFS-MKC) using the reference ATCC#12478 strain, and Monte Carlo simulation experiments for clinical dose selection and susceptibility breakpoint. We also performed a literature search to generate ethambutol MIC distribution for MKC. First, nine studies were identified with MIC of 587 isolates, and MIC 50 and MIC 90 identified as 4 and 16 mg/L, respectively. Second, the ethambutol MIC of the ATCC strain was 8 mg/L, and the mutation frequency was 4.23 × 10 −2 CFU/mL. Third, in the HFS-MKC, ethambutol failed to kill M. kansasii below stasis ( B 0 ), and resistance emerged rapidly. The target exposure was an AUC 0–24 /MIC of 5.47 (95% confidence interval: 1.17–9.77). Fourth, Monte Carlo experiments of 10,000 virtual subjects identified doses of 1,200 and 3,000 mg to achieve or exceed target exposure in 18.21% and 58.57% of patients; and PK/PD MIC susceptibility breakpoints were determined as 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Doses >1,200 mg/day may have a higher likelihood of ocular toxicity. The risk of toxicity versus no microbial kill benefit in HFS-MKC suggests the need for better drugs compared to ethambutol in the treatment of MKC lung disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gumbo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: