Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Xanthan gum (XG)-treated soils commonly exhibit improved strength, increased yield stress, and pronounced post-yield compression. However, despite these characteristics typical of structured geomaterials, their compression behaviour is still largely interpreted empirically, and a physically consistent framework for compression-induced destructuring in chemically stabilized compacted soils (CSCS) is lacking. This study investigates the compressibility and destructuring behaviour of XG-treated sand-bentonite mixture (SBM) with XG contents ranging from 1-3% and curing periods of 1-90 days. A framework based on the Untreated Compression Line (UCL) is proposed, using the untreated virgin compression line as a mechanically consistent reference to interpret destructuring. Results indicate that increasing XG content induces a structured response, characterized by higher swelling void ratios, larger recompression indices, elevated yield stresses, and progressive post-yield destructuring. In contrast, extended curing promotes hydrogel densification and reduces susceptibility to destructuring. Scanning electron microscopy observations reveal the collapse of polymer bridges during loading, supporting a swelling-destructuring mechanism. Strong correlations between unconfined compressive strength (q_u) and key destructuring parameters enable the development of a simplified predictive framework. This approach extends classical destructuring concepts to CSCS and provides a practical basis for predicting their compression behaviour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: