Broadband acoustic direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation remains challenging when the number of active sources is unknown and the available observations are affected by low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), limited snapshots, and reverberation. This paper proposes a source-number-free broadband DOA estimation framework based on covariance enhancement and subband spectrum fusion. The target frequency range is adaptively partitioned into multiple approximately narrowband subbands. Within each subband, a structured covariance-enhancement procedure is applied to stabilize the covariance eigenstructure under noisy and finite-sample conditions. A direction-dependent minimum-eigenvalue-difference spectrum is then constructed using the matching relationship between the minimum eigenvalues of the enhanced covariance matrix and a transformed matrix, without source-number-dependent signal- and noise-subspace partitioning. The resulting subband spectra are incoherently fused, and a median-absolute-deviation-based peak-extraction procedure jointly determines the source number and DOAs. Comparative simulations with WB-MUSIC, ERP, SRP-PHAT, and TOPS show that the proposed method provides comparable angular precision in successfully resolved trials under favorable conditions, while achieving higher localization accuracy and clearer source separation under low-SNR, limited-snapshot, and closely spaced source conditions. At an SNR of −15 dB, the proposed method achieves a localization accuracy of 86%. Ablation results indicate that trace-based loading within the covariance-enhancement procedure and cross-subband fusion provide the principal robustness improvements, whereas the Toeplitz-assisted operation has a more limited independent contribution under the investigated conditions. Experiments using open-environment and indoor circular-microphone-array recordings provide preliminary evidence of the feasibility of the proposed method under the tested broadband acoustic localization conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: