Existing formulae for low-crested structures (LCSs) neglect water-level differences. This study examined how asymmetric still-water levels affect the reflection, transmission and energy dissipation coefficients ( K R , K T , and K D ) of a permeable rubble-mound LCS in 216 wave-flume tests with independently controlled seaward and leeward levels, thereby imposing the water-level difference as a boundary condition distinct from wave-induced piling-up. Tests covered seaward and leeward depths ( h 1 and h 2 , respectively) of 17, 19 and 21 cm, yielding Δ h = h 1 − h 2 values from −4 to +4 cm in 2 cm increments. Measured significant wave heights ranged from 0.89 to 11.98 cm, and significant wave periods were 1.0, 1.3 and 1.6 s. For 72 conditions with h 1 = h 2 , existing reflection formulae yielded coefficients of determination (R 2 ) of 0.898 and 0.880, whereas an established transmission formula showed limited applicability. Mean K R increased from 0.377 at Δ h = + 4 cm to 0.539 at Δ h = − 4 cm , and mean K D decreased from 0.918 to 0.826; both trends persisted at fixed h 1 . The K T response reversed between overtopping and non-overtopping conditions. Run-up and run-down imagery was consistent with changes in effective infiltration associated with the hydraulic gradient and internal saturation state. Sensitivity analysis identified Δ h / h 1 as most strongly associated with the residuals of existing reflection formulae. Multiplicative corrections, which recover the baseline formulae exactly when h 1 = h 2 , reduced the root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 41.19% and 43.56% and increased R 2 from 0.756 to 0.916 and from 0.761 to 0.924, respectively, across all 216 conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: