Key result
Highest cumulative LCI-WC linked to ~35% higher odds of incident CVD versus lowest quartile.
Why the study?
The association between long-term cumulative exposure to composite lipid-abdominal obesity indicators and incident cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older Chinese adults remains unclear.
Does higher cumulative average lipoprotein combined index-waist circumference (LCI-WC) increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in Chinese middle-aged and older adults?
Cohort (n=4,597)
Yes
Does higher cumulative average lipoprotein combined index-waist circumference (LCI-WC) increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in Chinese middle-aged and older adults?
Odds Ratio: 1.352 (95% CI 1.041–1.755)
Absolute Event Rate: 16% vs 10.3%
p-value: p=0.023
Higher cumulative average LCI-WC is independently associated with increased odds of incident cardiovascular disease, suggesting it may be a useful epidemiological marker for combined lipid and central-adiposity burden.
LCI-WC was associated with incident CVD; extends combined lipid-obesity indices but leaves open incremental predictive value in diverse cohorts.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major public health burden among middle-aged and older adults in China. Dyslipidemia and central obesity jointly contribute to CVD risk, but the association between long-term cumulative exposure to composite lipid-abdominal obesity indicators and incident CVD remains unclear. This study examined whether cumulative average lipoprotein combined index–waist circumference (LCI-WC), defined using natural log-transformed lipoprotein combined index (LCI) and waist circumference (WC), was associated with incident CVD. Data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Cumulative average LCI-WC was calculated as the mean of LCI-WC values measured in 2011 and 2015, where LCI-WC was defined as ln (LCI)×WC. Incident CVD was assessed at the 2018 follow-up. Logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate the association between cumulative average LCI-WC and incident CVD. A total of 4,597 participants were included, of whom 2,473 (53.8%) were women. The mean age was 58.4 (8.5) years. By the 2018 follow-up, 638 participants (13.9%) had developed incident CVD. In the fully adjusted model, each 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in cumulative average LCI-WC was associated with a higher odds of incident CVD [odds ratio (OR), 1.137; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.040–1.242]. Compared with quartile 1 (Q1), participants in Q4 had a higher odds of incident CVD (OR, 1.352; 95% CI, 1.041–1.755; P for trend = 0.023). Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested a positive linear association (P overall = 0.019; P for nonlinearity = 0.374). Higher cumulative average LCI-WC was associated with increased odds of incident CVD among middle-aged and older Chinese adults. This composite index may serve as an exploratory epidemiological marker of combined lipid-related and central-adiposity burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular Disease (n=4,597). Cumulative average lipoprotein combined index-waist circumference (LCI-WC) vs. Lowest quartile of LCI-WC (Q1) was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease (OR 1.352, 95% CI 1.041-1.755, p=0.023). Participants in the highest quartile of cumulative average lipoprotein combined index-waist circumference (LCI-WC) had significantly higher odds of incident cardiovascular disease compared with the lowest quartile (OR 1.352).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: