Key result
Direct Healthcare Professional Communications show limited effectiveness, achieving high impact in only ~29% of evaluated outcomes.
Why the study?
Evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimization measures is an integral part of pharmacovigilance to ensure a positive benefit-risk balance in patients treated with medicinal products.
Systematic Review (n=81)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DHPCs show limited effectiveness; challenges sole reliance on current risk minimization and leaves open need for improved pharmacovigilance strategies.
PURPOSE: For both marketing authorization holders and regulatory authorities, evaluating the effectiveness of risk minimization measures is now an integral part of pharmacovigilance in the European Union. The overall aim of activities in this area is to assess the performance of risk minimization measures implemented in order to ensure a positive benefit-risk balance in patients treated with a medicinal product. METHODS: Following a review of the relevant literature, we developed a conceptual framework consisting of four domains (data, knowledge, behaviour and outcomes) intended for the evaluation of risk minimization measures put into practice in the Danish health-care system. For the implementation of the framework, four classes of monitoring variables can be named and defined: patient descriptors, performance-related indicators of knowledge, behaviour and outcomes. RESULTS: We reviewed the features of the framework when applied to historical, real-world data following the introduction of dabigatran in Denmark for the prophylactic treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the framework provided useful graphical displays and an opportunity for a statistical evaluation (interrupted time series analysis) of a regulatory intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nyeland et al. (2017) conducted a systematic review in Drug safety issues (n=81). Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPC) vs. Pre-DHPC baseline or non-targeted population was evaluated on Proportion of evaluated outcomes showing high impact (significant association in 75% to 100% of analyses).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: