Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: SB2 (SB2). Some have proposed that this improvement in capsule technology may lead to increased diagnostic yields; however, real world clinical data is currently lacking. AIM: To evaluate the clinically relevant findings of SB3 and SB2 capsules in a population of United States veterans. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 260 consecutive CE studies was performed including 130 SB3 and 130 SB2 capsule studies. Recorded variables included: age, gender, type of capsule, body mass index, exam completion, inpatient status, opioid use, diabetes, quality of preparation, gastric transit time, small bowel transit time, indication, finding, and if the exam resulted in a change in clinical management. The primary outcome measured was the detection of clinically relevant findings between SB3 and SB2 capsules. CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant difference in clinically relevant findings between SB3 and SB2 capsules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aasen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: