Key result
Cholesky factorization optimizes electrocardiographic inverse solutions, achieving ~0.9 correlation early in the QRS interval.
Why the study?
The effect of numerical factors such as regularization parameter choice and linear equation system solver on the accuracy of electrocardiographic inverse solutions was not well understood.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this work is to investigate the effect of certain numerical factors on the electrocardiographic inverse solution. Since usually the zero-order Tikhonov regularization is applied in order to solve the inverse problem, choosing the right regularization parameter is very important. The used linear equation system solver also plays an important role in the accuracy of the solution. Therefore these two factors were studied in a well defined model environment. Reference epicardial and body surface potential maps were generated in 1003 epicardial and 344 body surface points, respectively, by the Wei-Harumi model, for the QRS interval. The inverse problem has been solved with various regularization parameters and linear equation system solvers. The highest correlations (> 0.9) occurred in the first half of the QRS interval and the correlation fell below 0.6 at the end of the QRS. The result was highly dependent on the chosen regularization parameter and equation system solver, and it was significantly influenced also by the complexity of the epicardial potential distribution. The optimal solving configuration proved to be the application of the Cholesky factorization with the regularization parameter of 10 −14 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuboly et al. (2015) studied this question. Zero-order Tikhonov regularization parameters and linear equation system solvers vs. Various other regularization parameters and solvers was evaluated on Correlation between calculated and reference epicardial potential maps during the QRS interval. Cholesky factorization with a regularization parameter of 10^-14 was the optimal configuration for electrocardiographic inverse solutions, achieving >0.9 correlation early in the QRS interval.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: