Failures in microservice systems can produce correlated symptoms across services, motivating the study of structural information for root-cause localization alongside anomaly-based approaches. We study service-level localization from multivariate monitoring metrics under known fault-onset and metric-to-service mapping assumptions. Existing temporal and multilayer ranking methods rarely use relation-estimation reliability to control node-level information exchange between contemporaneous and lagged evidence. We propose Decoupled Multiplex Causal Ranking (DeCoR) and its core algorithm, Regime-aware Innovation Causal Estimation with Confidence-aware Multiplex Coupling (RICE-CM). RICE-CM derives both evidence types from a shared dynamics model fitted to the pre-fault normal segment. It aggregates edge confidence scores into node reliability, applies nonuniform diagonal coupling between same-metric replicas, and ranks services through reverse PageRank on a supra-adjacency matrix. We evaluated RICE-CM on a 300-case subset drawn from three RCAEval datasets: Sock Shop 1 (SS1), Sock Shop 2 (SS2), and Online Boutique (OB). With dataset-specific coupling settings selected on the same benchmark cases, it achieved Avg@5 scores of 0.6000, 0.7040, and 0.4864 on SS1, SS2, and OB, respectively. It achieved the highest Avg@5 among the evaluated methods on all three datasets and exceeded RUN on OB by 0.0288, while requiring approximately 1/33 of RUN’s runtime per case. Compared with RICE-only, RICE-CM improved Avg@5 by 0.0640, 0.0704, and 0.0624, respectively. Paired tests supported these gains on SS1 and SS2 after Holm correction, but not on OB. Against fixed-coupling RICE-MX, the gains were 0.0720, 0.0400, and 0.0336, respectively, with a Holm-adjusted p value of 0.0456 on each dataset. Positive observed gains over RICE-only occurred across all 12 dataset-fault-type combinations, whereas the coupling-parameter sweep showed dataset-dependent sensitivity. These results support node-reliability-driven nonuniform coupling over fixed coupling within the evaluated benchmarks and task assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: