The performance of bifunctional Ni–Re/zeolite catalysts in fatty-acid deoxygenation depends on the spatial organization of the metallic and acidic functions. In this work, the preparation sequence of bifunctional Ni–Re/HZSM-5 catalysts was varied to determine how metal organization and accessible acidity affect oleic acid hydrotreatment. Catalysts nominally containing 6 wt% Ni and 2 wt% Re were prepared by co-impregnation and by sequential Ni-first or Re-first impregnation. Additional calcination steps decreased Re retention from 2.0 wt% for NiRe/HZSM-5 to 1.5 and 1.0 wt% for Ni–Re/HZSM-5 and Re–Ni/HZSM-5, respectively. Co-impregnation gave the smallest XRD-derived Ni crystallites (9.2 nm), the highest apparent H 2 -chemisorption-derived dispersion of the series (2%), and a comparatively uniform metallic distribution. At 340 °C, 30 bar H 2 , and WHSV = 5 h⁻ 1 , all bimetallic catalysts maintained high oleic acid conversion, but the condensable-product distribution depended strongly on preparation route. NiRe/HZSM-5 initially favored alkyl aromatics, whereas Re–Ni/HZSM-5 favored C 1 ₇–C 18 paraffins and isoparaffins. After approximately 24 h, stearic acid accumulated despite sustained oleic acid conversion, indicating preferential loss of the deoxygenation function. Apparent coke contents followed Ni–Re/HZSM-5 (7.58%) > NiRe/HZSM-5 (6.32%) > Re–Ni/HZSM-5 (4.49%). The results show that impregnation sequence controls Re retention, accessible metallic surface, relative Brønsted/Lewis character, secondary conversion, and coke formation; none of the routes simultaneously maximized oxygen removal, hydrocarbon formation, and stability in the studied conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fontoura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: