Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Habitat conversion threatens the Greater Kafue Ecosystem (GKE), Zambia, one of southern Africa’s most important protected-area landscapes, yet its spatial predictors remain poorly quantified. We used a Random Forest classifier to map susceptibility to natural-habitat conversion across Kafue National Park (KNP) and its surrounding Game Management Areas (GMAs). The binary response was derived from Landsat classifications for 1984 and 2024, treating natural-to-anthropogenic cover transitions as conversion and fourteen socio-economic, climatic, topographic, proximity, and conservation predictors were evaluated. Because most predictors are contemporary, the model characterises spatial correlates of cumulative conversion rather than temporal drivers. On an independent, spatially blocked test set ( n = 1,751), it achieved an accuracy of 0.77, AUC-ROC of 0.83, F1-score of 0.81, and Cohen’s Kappa of 0.53, remaining stable under ten-fold spatial cross-validation (accuracy = 0.84 ± 0.07). A higher false-positive rate (0.34) than false-negative rate (0.14) indicated a precautionary bias suited to screening. Percentage cultivated land was the strongest predictor (mean decrease in impurity = 33.6%; univariate AUC = 0.91). Model-derived cut-points near 10% cultivated cover, 0.036 persons ha⁻¹, 4 km from settlements, and 898 mm rainfall discriminated higher- from lower-susceptibility conditions, though these are screening values, not validated ecological thresholds. Susceptibility mapping identified Bilili, Namwala, and Mumbwa as the principal high-susceptibility GMAs, whereas KNP remained predominantly low. The results support targeted monitoring and conservation prioritisation across the GKE and comparable Miombo landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulenga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: