BackgroundThe complexities of multilingualism in COVID-19 communication campaigns across Southeast Asia's multicultural countries remain unexplored.ObjectiveThis paper aims to map and summarize the development, implementation, and evaluation of COVID-19 preventive behavior and vaccination campaigns in the region.MethodsUtilizing the PRISMA-ScR framework, major databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 2020 and March 2025, focusing on the content and delivery of COVID-19 communication campaigns within multilingual Southeast Asian countries.ResultsTwenty articles were retrieved, most of which originated from Indonesia (n = 11), followed by Vietnam (n = 3), Malaysia, the Philippines, and Singapore (n = 2 each). Studies on prevention (n = 13) outnumbered those on vaccination campaigns (n = 5). Of the 86 described campaign materials, posters (n = 63) were the most prevalent media type, primarily developed by the government (n = 60). Most materials used the country's official language for the campaigns, with 49 for prevention and 27 for vaccination. Channels varied; government social media dominated in Malaysia, while physical public spaces were most common elsewhere. The strategic implementation of multilingual and culturally specific communication emerged as a key opportunity, in contrast to the major challenge of the widespread anti-vaccine misinformation on social media.ConclusionsThe reported communication materials were largely characterized by an urgent, mass-reach approach using a country's official language, which endangered linguistic minorities. Crucially, this review highlights a systemic mishap in campaign assessment, marked by a near-total absence of evidence-based impact data, hindering the evaluation of effective strategies for public health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warsito et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: