Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stress-induced birefringence in gradient-index (GRIN) lenses couples with the refractive index gradient to produce severe polarization aberrations, causing spatial separation between s- and p-polarized foci. Using a GPU-accelerated ray tracing framework (NVIDIA Warp), we systematically investigate this coupled effect and establish the effective-index model \(neff(r, p) = navg(r) + κ Δ navg (r/R)^2 ((p · a)^2 - 0.5)\). Our central discovery is an exact single-parameter scaling law: the entire spatial distribution of polarization aberration (PA) collapses onto a single scalar, \(std = 0.233 · split\) with \(R^2 = 0.99997\), independent of GRIN strength and stress coupling over a \(40×\) dynamic range. This hidden invariance is non-trivial because one quantity is an extreme-value statistic (maximum over rays) while the other is a distributional statistic (standard deviation); their strict proportionality implies a self-similar normalized aberration profile that survives even the strong-focusing regime (\(Δ navg = 0.20\)). The focus split itself scales linearly with both parameters (\(split ∝ κ0.99 Δ navg0.96\)), and the pupil-radius dependence is quantitatively captured by a Seidel spherical-aberration coefficient \(α = 0.364\) (\(R^2 = 0.993\)). Our results provide a practical design rule: measuring one easily accessible scalar (focus split) instantly predicts the full worst-case polarization aberration without any polarization ray tracing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gang Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: