Partnered individuals tend to report higher life satisfaction (LS) than singles (weighted Cohen’s d = .43). However, many studies have suffered from either small sample sizes, unaddressed moderators or confounding variables, and/or single-method biases. To simultaneously address these issues, we used the Estonian Biobank ( N = 77,378) to more accurately estimate the association ( d ) between romantic relationship status and LS. We examined potential moderators (age, gender, income, parental status) and confounders (personality domains and nuances, genetic/familial influences, single-method biases). Individuals in relationships had higher average LS (β = .34), but in a sibling discordant analysis controlling for shared familial backgrounds, polygenic scores for LS, and personality traits the effect was smaller (β = .23; only controlling for personality traits resulted in a similar association, suggesting they captured the other potential confounders). However, combining self-report with informant report to reduce measurement error, the within-family, personality traits-controlled association was d = .32. We believe this represents a more rigorous estimate to date, suggesting that previous studies may have both over- and underestimated the link due to confounders and measurement issues that can only be addressed with multiple methods. Finally, the single-partnered difference was larger among men and those without children, and only those highly or very highly satisfied with their relationship had higher LS than single individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: