This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Previous meta-analyses combined treatment with prevention interventions and there was a lack of comparative studies on preventive interventions for suicide. Aims: To evaluate and rank the effects of prevention interventions on self-harm, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and depression. Methods: We searched PubMed, HINARI, CENTRAL and ResearchGate until November 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials that reported suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior among adolescents and adults. Eligible studies were selected through systematic screening, and data were synthesized using a network meta-analysis with a random-effects model to assess and rank effects of psychosocial and behavioral interventions in January 2026. Results: This study included 94 trials (27,242 participants). Compared with control group, psychotherapy ( Odds ratio [OR] = 0.60; 95% CI [0.47, 0.76]), active outreach ( OR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.59, 0.90]), and other psychosocial and behavioral interventions (hereafter, “other type”; OR = 0.53; 95% CI [0.33, 0.86]) were the three most effective interventions in preventing suicidal behavior (moderate-quality evidence). Psychotherapy (Standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.18; 95% CI [−0.31, −0.05]; moderate-quality evidence) and other type (SMD = −0.60; 95% CI [−0.86, −0.33]; moderate-quality evidence) were the two most effective interventions in preventing suicidal ideation. Only psychotherapy was significantly more effective than control group ( OR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.48, 0.91]; moderate-quality evidence) in reducing self-harm. Only skills showed effectiveness in reducing depression with very low-quality evidence (SMD = −0.67; 95% CI: [−1.07, −0.28]). Conclusions: Psychotherapy consistently improved several suicide-related outcomes, indicating that clinical and community settings should prioritize this intervention. Healthcare policymakers and practitioners should integrate psychotherapy into regular mental health services and expand active outreach activities to improve conditions and use of the beneficiaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: