In software engineering chatrooms, communication is often hindered by imprecise questions that cannot be answered. Recognizing key entities (e.g., programming languages and libraries) and user intent (e.g., learning or requesting a review) can be essential for improving question clarity and facilitating better exchange. However, existing research using natural language processing techniques often overlooks these softwarespecific nuances. In this paper, we introduceSoftwarE-specificNamed entity recognition,Intent detection, andResolution classification (SENIR), a labelling approach that leverages a Large Language Model to annotate entities, intents, and resolution status in developer chatroom conversations. To offer quantitative guidance for improving question clarity and resolvability, we build a resolution prediction model that leverages SENIR’s entity and intent labels along with additional predictive features. We evaluate SENIR on the DISCO dataset using a subset of annotated chatroom dialogues. SENIR achieves an 86% F-score for entity recognition, a 71% F-score for intent detection, and an 89% F-score for resolution status classification. Furthermore, our resolution prediction model, tested with various sampling strategies (random undersampling and oversampling with SMOTE) and evaluation methods (5-fold cross-validation, 10-fold cross-validation, and bootstrapping), demonstrates AUC values ranging from 0.7 to 0.8. Key factors influencing resolution include positive sentiment and entities such asProgramming LanguageandUser Variableacross multiple intents, while diagnostic entities (e.g.,Error Name) are more relevant in error-related questions. Moreover, resolution rates vary significantly by intent: questions aboutAPI UsageandAPI Changeachieve higher resolution rates, whereasDiscrepancyandReviewhave lower resolution rates. A Chi-Square analysis confirms the statistical significance of these differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fathollahzadeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: