This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To evaluate the incremental diagnostic value of combining free prostate-specific antigen density (FPSAD) with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa,defined as Gleason score≥ 3+4) in the diagnostic gray zone (tPSA 4– 10 ng/mL). Methods: : This retrospective study analyzed 137 patients (75 with csPCa and 62 with non-clinically significant prostate cancer (ncsPCa) who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy at Xiangtan Central Hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. PI-RADS v2.1 scores were assigned based on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and prostate volume (PV) and FPSAD were calculated. Statistical analyses included chi-square/Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and independent t -tests for continuous variables. Logistic regression identified independent predictors of csPCa, and a nomogram model was developed. Model performance was evaluated using calibration curves and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Significant differences were observed in FPSAD, PI-RADS v2.1 scores, and free PSA (fPSA) between the csPCa and ncsPCa groups ( P < 0.01). FPSAD (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.22– 2.22, P < 0.01) and PI-RADS v2.1 scores (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.57– 3.70, P < 0.01) were independent predictors of csPCa. The combined FPSAD and PI-RADS v2.1 model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance (AUC =0.829) compared to FPSAD alone (AUC = 0.69) or PI-RADS v2.1 alone (AUC = 0.773) ( P < 0.01), with 91% sensitivity and 32% fewer unnecessary biopsies than PI-RADS≥ 3 criteria. In PI-RADS 3 subgroup (n=41), FPSAD correctly reclassified 13/18 (72.2%) indeterminate cases. Conclusion: For Asian men with tPSA 4– 10 ng/mL, the FPSAD+PI-RADS algorithm (cutoffs: > 0.017 and ≥ 4) provides 15– 20% higher accuracy than either marker alone, while reducing biopsies by 25%. This approach is particularly valuable for PI-RADS 3 cases, where it resolved > 65% of diagnostic uncertainties in our cohort. Keywords: FPSAD, PI-RADS V2.1, csPCa, ncsPCa, diagnostic value, tPSA
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: