This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The fast growth of biotechnology, genetic engineering, and brain-computer interfaces has caused us to rethink what it means to be human, mixing biology and technology in new ways. This thesis looks into the philosophical basis of humanity and the heated discussion between transhumanism and supporters of "natural" humanity. It also considers the ethical issues regarding the rights of artificial intelligence (AI) and genetically modified humans. By drawing on insights from philosophy, bioethics, law, and technology studies, it argues that while these developments can improve human abilities, they bring serious moral concerns about fairness, identity, and how society includes everyone. The analysis suggests that giving equal rights to AI and enhanced humans is vital for a fair future. It proposes ways to achieve this, like human rights frameworks and inclusive governance. By critically examining both historical and modern sources, this work adds to ongoing discussions on posthumanism, highlighting the need for ethical protections against inequality. Ultimately, it proposes that the future of humanity lies in accepting hybridity while maintaining essential values of dignity and autonomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Oloche David (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: