Key result
Early CCTA fails to shorten length of stay vs standard evaluation in diabetic patients.
Why the study?
Whether diabetic patients with acute chest pain derive similar benefits from early coronary CT angiography compared with standard evaluation was unknown.
RCT (n=1,000)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution against assuming early CCTA shortens stays in diabetic acute chest pain patients; subgroup analysis leaves open diabetes-specific effects.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) reduces emergency department length of stay compared with standard evaluation in patients with low- and intermediate-risk acute chest pain. Whether diabetic patients have similar benefits is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified analysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT II) multicenter trial, we randomized 1000 patients (17% diabetic) with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome to CCTA or standard evaluation. The rate of acute coronary syndrome was 8% in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P=1.0). Length of stay was unaffected by the CCTA strategy for diabetic patients (23.9 versus 27.2 hours, P=0.86) but was reduced for nondiabetic patients compared with standard evaluation (8.4 versus 26.5 hours, P<0.0001; P interaction=0.004). CCTA resulted in 3-fold more direct emergency department discharge in both groups (each P≤0.0001, P interaction=0.27). No difference in hospital admissions was seen between the 2 strategies in diabetic and nondiabetic patients (P interaction=0.09). Both groups had more downstream testing and higher radiation doses with CCTA, but these were highest in diabetic patients (all P interaction≤0.04). Diabetic patients had fewer normal CCTAs than nondiabetic patients (32% versus 50%, P=0.003) and similar normalcy rates with standard evaluation (P=0.70). Notably, 66% of diabetic patients had no or mild stenosis by CCTA with short length of stay comparable to that of nondiabetic patients (P=0.34), whereas those with >50% stenosis had a high prevalence of acute coronary syndrome, invasive coronary angiography, and revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of coronary anatomy with CCTA is beneficial for diabetic patients and can discriminate between lower risk patients with no or little coronary artery disease who can be discharged immediately and higher risk patients with moderate to severe disease who warrant further workup. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01084239.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truong et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Acute chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (n=1,000). Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs. Standard ED evaluation was evaluated on Median length of stay (hours) in diabetic patients (p=0.86). Early CCTA did not significantly reduce length of stay compared to standard evaluation in diabetic patients with acute chest pain (23.9 vs 27.2 hours, P=0.86), contrasting with a significant reduction in nondiabetic patients (8.4 vs 26.5 hours).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: