Key result
HEARTS initiative implementation is linked to a ~9-point increase in blood pressure control.
Why the study?
Early implementation of the HEARTS initiative in Suriname was evaluated to identify barriers, facilitators, and initial program performance in cardiovascular care.
Does implementation of the HEARTS initiative improve hypertension control and cardiovascular risk management in a resource-limited primary care setting?
Observational (n=11,187)
Yes
Does implementation of the HEARTS initiative improve hypertension control and cardiovascular risk management in a resource-limited primary care setting?
Early implementation of the HEARTS initiative in Suriname demonstrates that rapid scale-up of standardized, protocol-based cardiovascular care is feasible and can progressively improve hypertension control in resource-limited mixed health systems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve BP control in resource-limited settings; supports HEARTS evaluation but remains hypothesis-generating without RCTs.
Objective. To evaluate early implementation of the HEARTS initiative in Suriname (2022-2025), identify key barriers and facilitators, and assess initial program performance. Methods. A mixed-methods implementation evaluation was conducted using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework (RE-AIM). Qualitative data were collected through structured monitoring, training and workshop feedback, and stakeholder consultations from December 2021 to December 2025, and analyzed deductively using predefined CFIR constructs. Quantitative indicators were assessed across RE-AIM domains, including reach, adoption, implementation fidelity, and early maintenance. Results. HEARTS was implemented in 56 primary health care facilities, involving 460 health care workers and 11 187 patients. Scale-up was rapid, with facilities increasing from 21 to 56 over six semesters. Among patients with follow-up measurements, blood pressure control improved from 47.0% to 56.2%. However, only 52.6% had at least one follow-up visit, indicating suboptimal continuity of care. Key facilitators included strong political commitment, standardized treatment protocols, and a real-time digital monitoring system. Major barriers were limited workforce capacity, infrastructure variability, and financial constraints affecting access to essential medications and equipment. Conclusions. Early HEARTS implementation in Suriname shows that rapid scale-up of standardized cardiovascular care is feasible in a mixed public-private system. Strengthening follow-up, workforce capacity, and sustainable financing are essential to achieve long-term effectiveness and population-level impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhanpat et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease (n=11,187). HEARTS initiative vs. Baseline/early implementation (Semester 1) was evaluated on Blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg). Implementation of the HEARTS initiative in Suriname improved blood pressure control rates among patients with follow-up from 47.0% to 56.2% over six semesters.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: