Key result
Empagliflozin added to standard heart failure therapy proves cost-effective at ~7.7 million UZS per QALY gained.
Why the study?
Evidence on the economic value of empagliflozin for chronic heart failure in low- and middle-income countries remains limited.
Does adding empagliflozin to standard therapy improve cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years in patients with chronic heart failure in Uzbekistan?
Does adding empagliflozin to standard therapy improve cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years in patients with chronic heart failure in Uzbekistan?
Adding empagliflozin to standard therapy for chronic heart failure is a highly cost-effective treatment strategy in Uzbekistan.
Supports empagliflozin addition for HF in Uzbekistan; leaves open generalizability to other systems and thresholds.
INTRODUCTION: Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) is a major public health challenge associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Empagliflozin has demonstrated clinical benefits across the spectrum of heart failure; however, evidence on its economic value in low- and middle-income countries remains limited. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding empagliflozin to standard therapy for patients with chronic heart failure from the perspective of the healthcare payer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort-based Markov model with a 3-month cycle length and a 20- year time horizon was developed to simulate disease progression in CHF. Health states included no complications, cardiovascular complications, renal complications, and death. Outcomes were measured in Life Years (LYs), Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), total costs, and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs). Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Quality-adjusted life expectancy increased from 11.595 to 12.224 QALYs. Total discounted costs were 48,133,588 UZS for empagliflozin versus 43,261,361 UZS for standard therapy. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was 7,738,951 UZS per QALY gained, which was substantially below the national willingness-to-pay threshold of 141.6 million UZS. DISCUSSIONS: Since the ICER for empagliflozin compared with placebo is substantially lower than the calculated willingness-to-pay threshold, empagliflozin can be considered a costeffective treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Adding empagliflozin to standard therapy for CHF is a cost-effective intervention in the Republic of Uzbekistan and provides meaningful clinical and economic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sultanbayeva et al. (2026) studied Chronic Heart Failure. Empagliflozin vs. Standard therapy was evaluated on Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per QALY gained (ICER 7,738,951 UZS per QALY gained). Adding empagliflozin to standard therapy for chronic heart failure was cost-effective in Uzbekistan, yielding an ICER of 7,738,951 UZS per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on HFrEF treatmentMore from Cardiovascular & Haematological Disorders - Drug Targets