Key result
Point-of-care ultrasound identifies pericardial effusion with ~96% sensitivity in penetrating thoracic trauma.
Why the study?
The diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound for pericardial effusion in penetrating thoracic trauma patients was not well established.
Observational (n=2,099)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports POCUS for pericardial effusion in penetrating trauma; extends observational data but warrants prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: Point of care ultrasound has long been used in the trauma setting for rapid assessment and diagnosis of critically ill patients. Its utility for diagnosis of pericardial effusion in the setting of penetrating thoracic trauma has more recently been a topic of consideration, given the rapid decompensation that these patients can experience. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify the diagnostic accuracy of point of care ultrasound in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion among patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. METHODS: Retrospective review of 2099 patients brought to the trauma bay between the years 2016 and 2021 were analyzed for diagnosis of pericardial effusion. Patients who were diagnosed with a pericardial effusion were investigated for point of care ultrasound findings. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Prevalence was calculated to be 26.7 cases of pericardial effusion per 1000 patients presenting with penetrating thoracic trauma. Incidence was estimated to be 3.8 cases of pericardial effusion per 1000 person-years. Calculation of diagnostic capabilities of ED POCUS revealed a sensitivity of 96.36 %, a specificity of 100 %, PPV of 100 %, and NPV of 99.90 %. CONCLUSIONS: Point of Care cardiac ultrasonography is a reliable tool for the rapid diagnosis of pericardial effusion in penetrating thoracic trauma patients. Patients with ultrasound suggestive of this condition should receive rapid surgical management to prevent decompensation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mond et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Penetrating thoracic trauma (n=2,099). Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) vs. Clinical diagnosis was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for pericardial effusion (Sensitivity 96.36%, Specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 99.90%). Point of care ultrasound demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.36%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 99.90% for diagnosing pericardial effusion in penetrating thoracic trauma.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: