Tariff policies are fundamental instruments of international trade regulation, serving to protect domestic industries, facilitate trade management, and generate government revenue. In developing economies such as Afghanistan, customs duties constitute a significant component of public fiscal income. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of tariff implementation is influenced not only by the existence of regulatory frameworks but also by institutional administrative capacity, prevailing economic conditions, and the efficiency of bureaucratic processes. This study investigates the administrative, economic, and bureaucratic determinants of tariff implementation in Kandahar Province. The research employs a quantitative methodology using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships among administrative capacity, economic conditions, bureaucratic complexity, and tariff implementation outcomes. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to customs officials, traders, and government personnel engaged in tariff enforcement activities. The findings reveal that administrative capacity and economic stability exert significant positive effects on the efficiency of tariff enforcement, whereas bureaucratic complexity has a negative and statistically significant impact on policy implementation. This study contributes to the limited empirical literature on fiscal governance in Afghanistan by offering a systematic provincial-level analysis of tariff administration. Furthermore, the findings provide practical policy implications for enhancing institutional capacity, streamlining administrative procedures, and strengthening coordination among customs authorities. Such reforms are essential for improving revenue collection, increasing administrative transparency, and promoting effective trade regulation in Afghanistan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziarmal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: