This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based system, called Differential-Fusion YOLO (DF-YOLO), for MB2 canal detection and recognition in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. DF-YOLO is a dual-branch convolutional architecture that integrates differential feature extraction with adaptive fusion to highlight subtle anatomical variations between adjacent slices. A clinical CBCT dataset comprising 148 microscopically confirmed MB2-positive cases (7,804 axial slices) was retrospectively collected and divided into training ( n = 116), validation ( n = 16), and test ( n = 16) groups. Although all included patients had clinically confirmed MB2 canals, only a limited number of slices from each case contained visible MB2 canal structures; the remaining slices were therefore classified as slice-level negative samples. Model performance was benchmarked against state-of-the-art detectors and further examined through ablation and human–AI comparison studies. For the human–AI comparison, 20 microscopically confirmed MB2-positive cases were included. In addition, an exploratory patient-level analysis was conducted using the 16 MB2-positive cases from the test set and 10 additional MB2-negative cases. DF-YOLO yielded an internal slice-level precision of 83.6%, recall of 87.4%, mAP@0.5 of 92.0%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 53.6%. In the exploratory patient-level analysis based on the positive-slice ratio, the model achieved an AUC of 0.881. Using a threshold of ≥ 0.20, the patient-level sensitivity was 93.8%, specificity 60.0%, accuracy 80.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 78.9%, negative predictive value (NPV) 85.7%, and F1-score 85.7%. In the exploratory human–AI comparison, DF-YOLO achieved higher recall and faster inference than manual slice-level annotation. However, the limited number of positive cases in the clinician reader dataset precludes general conclusions about its diagnostic performance in routine clinical practice. The proposed DF-YOLO approach showed promising internal performance for MB2 canal detection on CBCT ROI slices. The exploratory patient-level analysis showed high sensitivity but only modest specificity in a small supplemental MB2-negative cohort. Larger, more rigorously curated negative-case datasets, external validation, and clinically representative cohorts are needed before clinical implementation can be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: