Background: Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery is increasingly adopted; however, evidence regarding outcomes during the early implementation phase remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of a newly established robotic colorectal surgery program at a tertiary referral center. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing robotic colorectal resection between November 2019 and February 2026 were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes, conversion rates, postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and histopathological results were assessed. Results: A total of 177 patients were included, with a progressive increase in surgical volume over time. Most procedures were performed for oncological indications (159, 90%), while 18 (10%) were performed for benign diseases. The most frequent procedures were right hemicolectomy (45%), left hemicolectomy (32%), and low anterior rectal resection (23%). Mean operative time was 331.1 ± 75.0 min. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 15 patients (8.5%), mainly due to extensive intra-abdominal adhesions, particularly during the early phase of the program. Postoperative complications occurred in 20 patients (11%), while 3 patients (2%) died during hospitalization. Major complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III) occurred in 7%, and anastomotic leakage in 3%. Mean hospital stay was 10.1 ± 7.6 days. R0 resection was reported in all cases, with adequate lymph-node retrieval for staging. Conclusions: In this single-center, non-comparative series, robotic colorectal surgery was feasible during program implementation, with acceptable short-term perioperative outcomes. Comparative studies are needed to determine its relative performance compared with laparoscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cicioni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: