Ultrasonic rangefinding is the default obstacle-detection modality in student-built mobile robots, yet the same low-cost transducers that make it affordable also produce multi-echo returns whose timing depends on transducer ringing, cross-sensor acoustic crosstalk and the geometry of nearby surfaces. A multi-echo time-of-flight model is stated in which each transducer emits a ringing envelope, the environment returns a superposition of echoes, and the receiver thresholds the envelope to produce a range estimate; crosstalk between co-mounted transducers is represented as an additive interference term whose magnitude depends on inter-sensor spacing and firing schedule. From the model, three propositions are derived: a ringing-induced lower bound on resolvable range, a crosstalk-induced bias in the reported range that grows as inter-sensor spacing shrinks, and a collision-avoidance reliability bound that translates range error into the probability of failing to stop before contact at a given approach speed. The propositions are evaluated against a declared benchmark configuration spanning cluster counts of 8, 16, 24 and 32 and effect sizes of 3, 5 and 8 percentage points, with 2000 replications per cell and an intraclass correlation of 0.64. The benchmark is methodological rather than empirical: it specifies the quantities a student laboratory must report if its collision-avoidance claims are to be comparable across builds, and it identifies the ringing and crosstalk parameters that dominate the reliability bound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: