How does inducing comparisons to both the poor and the rich shape support for redistribution toward the poor? I argue that when individuals who identify as middle-income perceive economic proximity to the poor alongside distance from the rich, one of two opposing mechanisms is activated: a social affinity mechanism, which increases support for redistribution, or a status and economic competition mechanism, which reduces it. Drawing on two survey experiments in the United Kingdom ( n = 3,470) that induce bidirectional comparisons, as well as observational data from 14 democracies, I find that support for redistribution to the poor is lowest when perceived downward proximity coincides with upward distance. Suggestive evidence shows that economic and status-based competition drive this relationship. Together, these findings advance our understanding of how social comparison processes shape attitudes toward redistribution and offer insights for policy makers when designing redistributive policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matias Engdal Christensen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: