Objectives: This study aimed to: (1) compare the absolute and relative external load during the warm-up of starting and substitute professional football players; (2) describe the subsequent running performance during the first 15 min of match play; and (3) quantify the within-player variability of the warm-up (WU) external load between roles. Methods: Sixteen professional male players (Swiss Second Division) were monitored using 10 Hz GPS units across 13 official matches (106 observations). Starters completed a standardized ~25 min on-field warm-up, while substitutes performed a cyclical sideline warm-up. Running performance was analysed during the first 15 min of play and across three consecutive 5 min intervals (0–5, 5–10, and 10–15 min) in the same players under both match-entry conditions: starters and substitutes. Results: Starters’ warm-up showed significantly longer duration (p < 0.001; d = 3.5), greater total distance covered in both absolute and relative terms (p < 0.001, d = 6.6; p < 0.001, d = 5.1, respectively), and higher maximal speed (p < 0.001; d = 1.4) compared to substitutes. However, substitutes covered more distance between 19.8 and 25.2 km·h−1 in either absolute and relative terms (p < 0.05, d = 1.3; p < 0.001, d = 3.6; respectively). No significant differences were found in external load during the overall 0–15 min match period between roles. Nevertheless, block-specific analysis revealed that substitutes performed significantly a greater number of decelerations (p < 0.05; d = 0.5), distance covered between 19.8 and 25.2 km·h−1 (p < 0.05; d = 0.79) and sprinting during the initial 0–5 min period (p < 0.05; d = 1.24). Conclusions: Substitutes’ warm-up exhibited substantially higher variability across almost all external load metrics compared with the warm-up completed by the starters, except for slightly higher or identical variability in the number of accelerations and decelerations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagattini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: