Background Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) is a rare HPV-related condition with heterogeneous behavior and a relevant recurrence risk. Factors associated with severity and recurrence remain incompletely defined.Objective To explore clinical, cytological, virological, and colposcopic features associated with high-grade VAIN and recurrence.Methods This retrospective study included 42 women with histologically confirmed VAIN at a tertiary center between January 2020 and January 2026. All underwent vaginal cytology, high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genotyping, colposcopy, and biopsy. Histology was classified as VAIN1 or VAIN2-3. Recurrence was defined as a histologically confirmed lesion after treatment and documented disease-free assessment. Associations were assessed using bivariate and exact analyses.Results VAIN2-3 was diagnosed in 31 women (73.8%). Among HR-HPV-positive women, HPV16-related infection was more frequent in VAIN2-3 than VAIN1 (65.4% vs 18.2%; OR 8.50, 95% CI 1.27–91.56; p = 0.013). Cytology was associated with histological grade (p = 0.024); all women with HSIL/ASC-H had VAIN2-3, although sensitivity was limited. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, eight women (19.0%) recurred after a median of 11.5 months. HPV16-related infection was more frequent with recurrence (75.0% vs 38.2%; OR 4.85, 95% CI 0.70–54.01; p = 0.112), but the evidence was not definitive. HPV16-only infection showed borderline evidence of association (p = 0.050), while no clear outcome pattern emerged for multiple-genotype infection. No other significant associations with recurrence were observed.Conclusion HPV16-related infection was associated with high-grade histology among HR-HPV-positive women, while its prognostic relevance for recurrence remains uncertain. The limited sensitivity of cytology underscores the value of multimodal assessment. These exploratory signals warrant prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corte et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: