Background: Although HPV vaccination is an effective cancer-prevention strategy, vaccination uptake among young adults remains suboptimal in many countries despite generally positive attitudes towards vaccination. The aim of this study was to assess HPV-related knowledge, vaccination uptake and intentions, awareness of the national vaccination programme, and attitudes towards vaccination among university students in health-related degree programmes. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among 428 students of Public Health, Dietetics, and Physiotherapy. Results: Basic HPV knowledge was high: 94.9% correctly identified the meaning of HPV and 95.3% identified sexual transmission as the main route of transmission. However, recognition of specific HPV risk factors was heterogeneous. Overall, 32.5% of students had completed the vaccination schedule or were in the process of vaccination, while 57.5% were unvaccinated but willing to vaccinate. The initiation of HPV vaccination was significantly associated with sex (χ2(1) = 18.739, p < 0.001; OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.73–4.44), but not with field of study (p = 0.370). Awareness of the national free HPV vaccination programme was high (91.1%). Most respondents recognised the public-health importance of HPV vaccination and supported its promotion in schools. General support for vaccination was also high (93.1%). Conclusions: This study identified a substantial gap between HPV vaccination uptake and vaccination intention among university students taking health-related subjects. Despite high basic HPV awareness and generally favourable attitudes towards vaccination, some gaps remained in specific vaccination-related knowledge. Interventions should therefore combine targeted education with measures addressing barriers to vaccination, with the aim of translating vaccination intentions into higher vaccine uptake.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kałucka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: