Objectives: Microneedling is a promising treatment for hypertrophic scars (HSc); however, documentation of its effects remains limited. The purpose of this study was to objectively quantify scar changes and patient-reported outcomes following microneedling compared with within-patient matched control scars. Methods: Thirty-six adult burn survivors with two similar HSc and who completed the study received five microneedling treatments at six-week intervals in addition to usual care on a randomly assigned HSc. The matched scar received usual care alone. Objective outcomes (elasticity, erythema, melanin, thickness, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL)) were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks post-treatment. Participant perception was evaluated using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale at baseline and at 6 weeks post-treatment. Results: Within-scar comparisons at both post-treatment time points demonstrated significant reduction of erythema and TEWL in treated scars and improvement of elasticity and thickness for both scars. Linear mixed-effects models adjusting for baseline values revealed a significant between-group difference favoring the control scar at 6 weeks only for elasticity and the microneedling for erythema and TEWL at 12 weeks. Patient-reported improvements in color, stiffness and thickness were observed for both scars. A significant between-group difference was observed solely for overall scar opinion. Conclusions: Microneedling may enhance specific aspects of scar maturation and improve overall scar opinion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nedelec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: