Explicit ratio prompts can request intermediate writing styles, but endpoint classification does not reveal proportional responses at internal ratios. We present a geometric protocol using model-specific endpoints and shared references in external sentence-embedding spaces. It excludes mechanically perfect endpoints from primary errors, retains unclipped projections, and separates axial calibration error from normalized off-axis drift. StyleBlend-Bench contains eight style axes and 320 scenarios. Five Qwen3.5 and Qwen3.6 checkpoints generated 33,600 texts over seven ratios and three seeds; three encoders produced 100,800 geometric records. An external GPT generator adds 6719 usable texts. A full five-model prompt-by-temperature experiment contains 95,994 usable condition records. Shared-reference BGE-M3 calibration error ranges from 0.176 to 0.212; other encoder/reference choices change model ordering. Two automatic evaluators correlate strongly in style intensity (r = 0.910), but content-pass agreement is 76.2%. The trajectories were rarely one-dimensional: first-component variance ranged from 0.349 to 0.408 and ordered path-length ratios from 4.64 to 5.20. The protocol diagnoses model response under specified anchors and encoders; it does not establish a human perceptual scale or absolute cross-model style coordinate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: