Austenitic stainless steel 316L (SS316L) is used in orthopedic and dental implants, surgical instruments, and aerospace fluid-handling components because of its corrosion resistance and ductility. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) produces these parts with internal channels that casting and machining cannot deliver. However, as-built SS316L surfaces contain spatter, partially fused powder, and near-surface porosity that raise roughness and reduce fatigue strength, corrosion resistance, and wear performance. Producing parts that meet both surface and mechanical requirements in a single build remains difficult. This study examines how laser power, scanning speed, layer thickness, and hatch spacing affect the surface roughness, microhardness, and wear of SLM-fabricated SS316L. A Box–Behnken Design under Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used for 27 experimental trials. Surface roughness was measured by stylus profilometry, microhardness by Vickers indentation, and dry sliding wear with a block-on-disc tribometer. Regression analysis and multi-response desirability optimization were carried out in Minitab. Processing parameters showed clear effects on surface quality and hardness; the wear response varied considerably because of localized surface defects and particle adhesion. Multi-objective optimization gave a composite desirability of 0.7603 at 260.6 W, 507.1 mm/s, 41.9 μm, and 120.0 μm. The predicted upper surface roughness, side surface roughness, and microhardness were 5.74 μm, 13.63 μm, and 210.39 HV, respectively. Run 26, tested at a volumetric energy density (VED) of 125.0 J/mm3, recorded an upper surface roughness of 5.48 μm and a microhardness of 218.1 HV. Surface defects strongly influenced the sliding response. The study provides a practical RSM-based route for selecting SLM parameters that balance surface quality and microhardness in SS316L components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: