Existing steel–timber structures may exhibit limited composite action between the two materials. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel sleeve-connected prefabricated steel–timber (SCPST) beam–column joint that utilizes steel sleeves and high-strength bolts for assembly. To assess its seismic performance, five full-scale interior joint specimens with different beam-sleeve thicknesses and lengths were tested under low-cycle reversed loading. The experimental results revealed that deformation and damage were concentrated at the beam ends, whereas the timber columns remained essentially elastic, satisfying the strong-column–weak-beam seismic design objectives. Within the tested specimen matrix, the peak load of the specimen with an 8 mm beam-sleeve thickness was 43.75% higher than that of the 4 mm specimen, while that of the specimen with a 400 mm sleeve length was 17.46% higher than that of the 300 mm specimen. Frictional slip at the timber–steel interfaces and yielding of the stiffeners were identified as the primary energy-dissipation mechanisms. Simplified analytical expressions based on Eurocode 3 and Chinese timber design provisions were developed to evaluate three potential beam-end failure modes, and the calculated resistances differed from the experimental results by less than 10%. A simplified finite element model was also established in ABAQUS. The simulated failure patterns and peak loads were in reasonable agreement with the experimental observations, with average peak-load errors of 2–6%. These results indicate that the analytical resistance estimates and simplified numerical model can provide a preliminary basis for evaluating the resistance and global response of SCPST joints within the investigated parameter range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: