Spatial prediction is a fundamental task in geographic information science and environmental resource assessment. However, under complex terrain and heterogeneous covariates, models relying only on point-scale attributes or a single global relationship often have difficulty representing spatial context and regional heterogeneity. This study proposes a second-dimension-enhanced spatial context-aware modeling framework (SDA-SCA) that integrates first-dimension covariates, neighborhood-based second-dimension features, covariate screening, spatially constrained stratification, and local model training. Using two independently constructed annual spatial-prediction cases based on surface solar radiation observations from 670 stations in China in 2022 and 2023, five modeling schemes—Ordinary Kriging, Geographically Weighted Random Forest (GWRF), first-dimension attribute modeling (FDA), second-dimension augmented modeling (SDA), and SDA-SCA—were evaluated under spatial cross-validation. SDA-SCA showed a consistent predictive advantage across the two independent annual cases and the three evaluated model families. Relative to FDA, SDA-SCA increased R2 by 0.11–0.16 in 2022 and 0.17–0.21 in 2023, while reducing RMSE by 12.4%–17.7% and 24.3%–33.7%, and MAE by 22.8%–35.5% and 31.5%–50.4%, respectively. Stage-wise ablation showed that the FDA-to-SDA step produced consistent but moderate improvements, whereas the SDA-to-SDA-SCA step provided larger and more stable gains. These results indicate that second-dimension features improve the representation of neighborhood context, and their predictive value is further strengthened when coupled with spatial stratification. SHAP analysis further confirmed the substantial contribution of second-dimension features to the integrated model. The proposed framework provides an extensible pathway for spatial prediction tasks requiring the joint representation of local attributes, neighborhood context, and spatial heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MENG et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: